Lighter Footstep: 5 Reasons Not to Drink Bottled Water
Editor's note: This week, Lighter Footstep editor Chris Baskind takes a look at reasons not to buy or drink bottled water. This post was originally published on June 19, 2007.
Bottled water is healthy water — right?
That's what the marketers would have us believe. Just look at the labels or the bottled water ads: deep, pristine pools of spring water; majestic alpine peaks; healthy, active people gulping down icy bottled water between biking in the park and a trip to the yoga studio.
In reality, bottled water is just water. That fact isn't stopping people from buying a lot of it. Estimates variously place worldwide bottled water sales at between $50 and $100 billion each year, with the market expanding at the startling annual rate of 7 percent.
Bottled water is big business. But in terms of sustainability, bottled water is a dry well. It's costly, wasteful, and distracts from the brass ring of public health: the construction and maintenance of safe municipal water systems.
Want some solid reasons to kick the bottled water habit? We've rounded up five to get you started.
Bottled water isn't a good value
Take, for instance, Pepsi's Aquafina or Coca-Cola's Dasani bottled water. Both are sold in 20 ounce sizes and can be purchased from vending machines alongside soft drinks — and at the same price. Assuming you can find a $1 machine, that works out to 5 cents an ounce. These two brands are essentially filtered tap water, bottled close to their distribution point. Most municipal water costs less than one cent per gallon.
Now consider another widely-sold liquid: gasoline. It has to be pumped out of the ground in the form of crude oil, shipped to a refinery (often halfway across the world), and shipped again to your local filling station.
In the U.S., the average price per gallon is hovering around $3. There are 128 ounces in a gallon, which puts the current price of gasoline at fraction over 2 cents an ounce.
And that's why there's no shortage of companies which want to get into the business. In terms of price versus production cost, bottled water puts Big Oil to shame.
No healthier than tap water
In theory, bottled water in the United States falls under the regulatory authority of the Food and Drug Administration. In practice, about 70 percent of bottled water never crosses state lines for sale, making it exempt from FDA oversight.
On the other hand, water systems in the developed world are well-regulated. In the U.S., for instance, municipal water falls under the purview of the Environmental Protection Agency, and is regularly inspected for bacteria and toxic chemicals. Want to know how your community scores? Check out the Environmental Working Group's National Tap Water Database.
While public safety groups correctly point out that many municipal water systems are aging and there remain hundreds of chemical contaminants for which no standards have been established, there's very little empirical evidence which suggests bottled water is any cleaner or better for you than its tap equivalent.
Bottled water means garbage
Bottled water produces up to 1.5 million tons of plastic waste per year. According to Food and Water Watch, that plastic requires up to 47 million gallons of oil per year to produce. And while the plastic used to bottle beverages is of high quality and in demand by recyclers, over 80 percent of plastic bottles are simply thrown away.
That assumes empty bottles actually make it to a garbage can. Plastic waste is now at such a volume that vast eddies of current-bound plastic trash now spin endlessly in the world's major oceans. This represents a great risk to marine life, killing birds and fish which mistake our garbage for food.
Thanks to its slow decay rate, the vast majority of all plastics ever produced still exist … somewhere.
Bottled water means less attention to public systems
Many people drink bottled water because they don't like the taste of their local tap water, or because they question its safety.
This is like running around with a slow leak in your tire, topping it off every few days rather than taking it to be patched. Only the very affluent can afford to switch their water consumption to bottled sources. Once distanced from public systems, these consumers have little incentive to support bond issues and other methods of upgrading municipal water treatment.
There's plenty of need. In California, for example, the American Society of Civil Engineers estimated the requirement of $17.5 billion in improvements to the state's drinking water infrastructure as recently as 2005. In the same year, the state lost 222 million gallons of drinkable water to leaky pipes.
The corporatization of water
In the documentary film Thirst, authors Alan Snitow and Deborah Kaufman demonstrated the rapid worldwide privatization of municipal water supplies, and the effect these purchases are having on local economies.
Water is being called the "Blue Gold" of the 21st century. Thanks to increasing urbanization and population, shifting climates, and industrial pollution, fresh water is becoming humanity's most precious resource.
Multinational corporations are stepping in to purchase groundwater and distribution rights wherever they can, and the bottled water industry is an important component in their drive to commoditize what many feel is a basic human right: the access to safe and affordable water.
What can you do?
There's a simple alternative to bottled water: buy a stainless steel thermos, and use it. Don't like the way your local tap water tastes? Inexpensive carbon filters will turn most tap water sparking fresh at a fraction of bottled water's cost.
Consider taking Food and Water Watch's No Bottled Water Pledge. Conserve water wherever possible, and stay on top of local water issues.
Want to know more? Start with the Sierra Club's fact sheet on bottled water.
Bottoms up!
Copyright © 2007 Lighter Footstep Media
Image credit: Wikimedia
Tags: bottled+water, Food, Health and Health Products, plastic, toxins, water
- Uncategorized


February 20th, 2008 at 3:41 pm
‘The fundamental modern idiocy is not whether the water we drink comes from plastic bottles rather than our own taps, but the fact that we have allowed ourselves to be persuaded that we should be drinking so much of the stuff in any form.’
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/dominic-lawson/dominic-lawson-bottled-or-tap-we-drink-far-too-much-water-783976.html
April 22nd, 2008 at 12:42 pm
[...] out of our houses and out of our drains, thereby keeping the chemicals out of our environment. 21. No more bottled water! Use your own re-usable bottle. The plastic in our environment and the chemicals from creating the [...]
May 5th, 2008 at 3:30 pm
[...] know. I know. We actually all know the reasons not to do this. But my thirst won out and I was left with a happy sigh and an empty [...]
July 1st, 2008 at 12:00 am
Ah, did anyone ever pick up on what Evian is spelled backward? If you can’t figure it out, it’s naive….which is what we are about bottled water. I have to confess I buy the stuff at the Super Store that is reverse osmosis. It tastes better than our tap water and because we rent, we can’t start messing with the plumbing.
July 22nd, 2008 at 12:27 am
[...] out of our houses and out of our drains, thereby keeping the chemicals out of our environment. 21. Say no to bottled water! Use your own re-usable bottle. The plastic in our environment and the chemicals from creating the [...]
December 5th, 2008 at 3:57 pm
As a breast cancer “survivor,” and I consider us ALL survivors, btw, I first started buying water when I was diagnosed. Why? Because I didn’t trust my government to tell me the TRUTH about my water. I trust them even less now and I really feel bad about feeling this way…it brings no joy.
February 24th, 2009 at 5:55 pm
The problem, for example, in the UK, when I lived there, was that no amount of filtration, carbon or other, could removed dissolved chemicals, thus even having super duper filtration systems installed, and councils recycling and ‘cleaning up’ water from sewerage to beyond sparkling wonderfully tasty drinking quality, one was still inadvertantly swallowing everyone else’s birth control pills, or others’ antibiotics… so how do we get around that? These ‘medicines’ and other chemicals are impossible to get rid of… that is why I drink bottled water. However I do buy 20 litre refills, and keep only one bottle for myself, that I fill up regularly from the 20 litre refill supply bottle… any ideas re these chemicals anyone?
August 16th, 2009 at 1:02 am
Tjitske Post Says:
“one was still inadvertantly swallowing everyone else’s birth control pills, or others’ antibiotics… so how do we get around that? These ‘medicines’ and other chemicals are impossible to get rid of…”
The medicines are no problem at all if you’re using a reverse-osmosis home filter. They’re mainly (almost exclusively) large organic molecules, so they’re one of the easiest contaminants to remove. If the filters will remove chlorine (which according to the spec they quite happily do) which has an atomic mass of about 35 and therefore a molecular mass of 70 then they’ll certainly remove molecules with 5 or 10 times that mass. Ok, the mass and the size are not strictly proportional but if anything the size rises faster than the mass. Complex organics are not going to make it through an RO membrane.
I can’t believe the way that so many here are able to keep a straight face in giving their reasons for drinking pollution heavy plastic bottles full of kilogram upon kilogram of water that’s been transported hundreds if not thousands of miles just to get to their supermarket. If a tenth of the money spent on bottled water was invested into the supply infrastructure we’d be drinking stuff that’s *purer* straight out of our taps.
But no, those same people who’re willing to spend endless cash on plastic covered bull**** would howl and scream and generally have kittens if their tax bill went up by 2 percent to pay for improving the pipework.
Someone’s bound to make out that the tax increase wouldn’t get invested in the water system, so to forestall them..
How many people think their piped water should improve?
How many votes is that?
Why don’t those (potential) votes get together to cause something to be done?
Can anyone spell a-p-a-t-h-e-t-i-c ?
Personally, reading some of the justifications for continuing to belch pollution around the planet just so that the justifiers can continue to carry their plastic ‘coolness symbol’ around town, I would remove the initial letter..
Dave J.
August 17th, 2009 at 11:31 am
Hmm, ok there’s probably not a lot of point commenting on a page thats’s this old, but really, if the sysop thinks that then couldn’t the ability to submit could be removed? It’s probably best if this comment ‘fails’ moderation as I’m only making it in order to ‘prod’ the processing along a bit. I keep pages I’ve put comments on open in my browser (so they re-open the next time I start up in the morning) because I like to see if they’ve been accepted or not. Umm, I’ve been looking at this one for a few days now…
Dave J.